AustLit logo

AustLit

y separately published work icon A/b : Auto/Biography Studies periodical issue   peer reviewed assertion
Issue Details: First known date: 2020... vol. 35 no. 2 2020 of a/b : Auto/Biography Studies est. 1985 A/b : Auto/Biography Studies
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Contents

* Contents derived from the 2020 version. Please note that other versions/publications may contain different contents. See the Publication Details.
Implicated Subjects, Gillian Whitlock , single work criticism

' A questioning about the ethics of reading and the visualization of refugees and asylum-seekers in graphic life narratives recurs throughout this issue, and necessarily so, given the urgency of scholarly work on the inhumanities of forced migration now. How do we bear “adequate witness” to graphic narratives that document the undocumented, receiving their testimony without deforming it by doubt, or substituting different terms of value than the ones offered by the witnesses themselves? The distinction between the spectator, as the detached observer, and the witness, who undertakes an ethical look that mobilizes a sense of responsibility, is critical here. Many of us have claimed that the gutters, frames, and lines of autographic art, its grammar and technology, summon ethical engagement. Comics do not merely represent; they materialize, they are productive, creating ways of seeing and feeling. As the editors of this special issue suggest in their introduction—which immediately alerts us to these questions on the ethical positioning of the artist-witness and the reader-witness—comics are an intersubjective, immersive representational form, where the reader is drawn into affective and ethical exchanges as we project meanings into the gaps and gutters on the page. But what forms does this ethical engagement take? What are the outcomes of “mobilizing responsibility” and why do these questions become urgent and personal when the subjects of autographic art are refugees, migrants, and asylum-seekers?' (Introduction)

(p. 495-501)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Last amended 28 Jun 2023 12:37:57
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X