AustLit logo

AustLit

Daniel Hempel Daniel Hempel i(11045897 works by)
Gender: Male
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Works By

Preview all
1 y separately published work icon Australia as the Antipodal Utopia : European Imaginations From Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century Daniel Hempel , London : Anthem Press , 2019 17396027 2019 multi chapter work criticism

'Australia has a fascinating history of visions. As the antipode to Europe, the continent has provided a radically different and uniquely fertile ground for envisioning places, spaces and societies. ‘The Antipodal Utopia’ evaluates this complex intellectual history by mapping out how Western visions of Australia evolved from antiquity to the modern period, with particular focus on the long nineteenth century. The book is underpinned by the provocative argument that due to its unique ‘antipodality’ (its antipodal relationship with Europe), Australia is imagined as a particular form of utopia – but since one person’s utopia is, more often than not, another’s dystopia, Australia’s utopian quality is both complex and highly ambiguous. Drawing on the rich field of utopian studies, ‘The Antipodal Utopia’ provides an original and insightful study of Australia’s place in the Western imagination and makes meaningful conceptual and analytical contributions to the fields of utopian theory, Australian studies and intellectual history.'

Source: Publisher's blurb.

1 “This Fantastic Land of Monstrosities” : The Aesthetic of the Australian Grotesque in the Long Nineteenth Century Daniel Hempel , 2016 single work criticism
— Appears in: Antipodes , December vol. 30 no. 2 2016; (p. 305-316)

'T'he grotesque holds a pivotal place in Australia's cultural history It is the purpose of this paper to showcase the significance and history of the Australian grotesque by exploring the intricate network of aesthetic and intellectual preconceptions that underpins it. The category of the Australian grotesque provides a specific instance of a larger argument I am at present developing about the role of utopian thought in the foundation of nonindigenous Australia, and it is in relation to this larger theoretical perspective that I argue that the Australian grotesque forms a quilting point at which two oppositional modes of representing Australia, the utopian and the dystopian, converge. The grotesque, in other words, has served contradictory aesthetic and intellectual ends throughout Australia's history, but has ultimately provided a form of coping mechanism for dealing with what was perceived to be the strangeness of Australia, that is, the incomprehensible elusiveness and ineffability of the Australian experience as felt by the European subject Due to the fact that the grotesque permeates Australian culture in a myriad of ways, my discussion of it is necessarily selective But since my focus Ices on the long nineteenth century, the period in which the aforementioned feeling of estrangement was arguably most acute, my discussion should spotlight what constitute the most prominent issues and principles of the grotesque in an Australian context By the same token, such probing into the aesthetic and philosophical roots that predate and inform the Australian grotesque inevitably brings to light how the transplantation of this European aesthetic into the Australian environment played a critical role in the ideology of settlement Thus, the representational processes by which the Australian grotesque supported and legitimized imperial ideology are also of particular concern ' (Introduction)

1 Utopia and Ideology in the Vision of the Jindyworobaks Daniel Hempel , 2016 single work criticism
— Appears in: Journal of the European Association for Studies on Australia , vol. 7 no. 2 2016; (p. 4-14)
'This article discusses the vision behind the Jindyworobak movement in terms of its complex interplay between progressive utopianism and ideological regression. The Jindyworobaks, an Australian literary movement of the twentieth century, sought a deeper connection with the Australian environment based on appreciation and a willingness to learn from its indigenous traditions. At the same time, however, their writings still deny the Aboriginal subaltern a voice, and effectively perpetuate the power structures the Jindyworobaks seemingly oppose. This intriguing interplay forms the basis of this article, which draws on a conceptual framework inspired by Paul Ricœur, Ernst Bloch and Slavoj Zizek to map out the interactions between utopia and ideology in the vision of the Jindyworobaks.' (Publication abstract)
X