AustLit logo

AustLit

María J. López María J. López i(A148710 works by) (a.k.a. María Lopez)
Gender: Female
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Works By

Preview all
1 Don Quixote, Benengeli and Coetzee’s Jesus Trilogy María J. López , 2024 single work criticism
— Appears in: English Studies , vol. 105 no. 2 2024; (p. 222-241)

'This article focuses on the central role of Don Quixote (1605, 1615) in J.M. Coetzee’s Jesus novels, arguing for the relevance of the fact that it is Benengeli, the fictional Moorish historian – and not Cervantes – who is presented as the author of the Spanish novel. This is first explored in relation to the analogy that The Childhood of Jesus (2013) makes between authorship and paternity, along with the depiction of the relationship between authors and characters as one of temporary, non-substantial stepfatherhood. The disruption of Don Quixote’s authorship/paternity also traverses the trilogy’s questioning of linguistic origins, and concern with linguistic processes of estrangement, displacement and irony. Finally, Cervantes’s absence in Coetzee’s novels is examined in relation to David’s act of trust and blind belief in the character of Don Quixote, a response to both the performative power of words and the capacity of literary characters to outstrip their original authors.' (Publication abstract)

1 Kai Wiegandt. 2019. J. M. Coetzee’s Revisions of the Human: Posthumanism and Narrative Form. María J. López , 2022 single work review
— Appears in: Anglia : Zeitschrift Fur Englische Philologie , December vol. 140 no. 3-4 2022; (p. 653-657)

— Review of J. M. Coetzee's Revisions of the Human : Posthumanism and Narrative Form Kai Wiegandt , 2019 multi chapter work criticism

'Recent years have witnessed a steep rise in studies and monographs on the work of J. M. Coetzee. Many of them have been prompted by the publication of what has come to be known as the Jesus Trilogy, made up of the novels The Childhood of Jesus (2013), The Schooldays of Jesus (2016) and The Death of Jesus (2019), which in their highly original form and distinctive concerns have opened up the field to new readings and critical approaches to Coetzee’s fiction. Coetzee’s manuscripts at the Ransom Center of the University of Texas at Austin have also contributed to this increase in critical responses, with lots of critics turning to the exploration of the archive as a new way of analysing different aspects of Coetzee’s life and literary production.' (Introduction)

1 'God Knows Whether There Is a Dulcinea in This World or Not' : Idealised Passion and Undecidable Desire in J. M. Coetzee María J. López , 2019 single work criticism
— Appears in: Reading Coetzee's Women 2019; (p. 165-182)
Analyses Coetzee's depiction of women via the influence on his work on Don Quixote and the figure of Dulcinea.
1 Miguel de Cervantes and J.M. Coetzee : An Unacknowledged Paternity María J. López , 2013 single work criticism
— Appears in: Journal of Literary Studies , vol. 29 no. 4 2013; (p. 80-97)
'This article points to the 17th-century Spanish writer, Miguel de Cervantes, as one important literary predecessor of the contemporary South African writer, J.M. Coetzee, a relation that has generally passed unnoticed among critics. This relation is brought to the foreground in Coetzee’s most recent novel, The Childhood of Jesus (2013), but it also underlies his previous ones, Age of Iron (1998), Disgrace (2000), and Slow Man (2005), as well as his critical pieces, “The Novel Today” (1988) and the “Jerusalem Prize Acceptance Speech” (1992b), all of which contain echoes of Cervantes’s masterpiece, Don Quixote ([1605, 1615]2005). My argument is that the conflict between imagination and reality, the novel and history, central in Coetzee’s fictional and non-fictional production, needs to be re-examined as a fundamentally Cervantine one. The adventures and fate of Don Quixote lie behind Coetzee’s exploration of whether literature may be an effective and ethical guide in our dealings with reality, whether the ordinary may be transformed into the extraordinary, and of the relation between the literary imagination and the onslaughts of the real world.' (Publisher's blurb)
1 y separately published work icon Acts of Visitation : The Narrative of J.M. Coetzee María J. López , Amsterdam New York (City) : Rodopi , 2011 Z1880004 2011 single work criticism

'This study traces, in J.M. Coetzee's fictional and non-fictional production, an imaginative and intellectual masterplot deriving from Coetzee's perception of European presence in (South) Africa as having its origin in an act of illegitimate penetration and fraudulent visitation. In Coetzee's novels, the historical and political problem of a hostile occupation and unfair distribution of the land finds a correspondence in the domestic space of house and farm, and the uneasy cohabitation of its occupants, along with the relation between hosts and guests. The seminal dimension of the categories of penetration and visitation is highlighted, as these are shown to operate not only on a spatial level but also on an epistemological, physical, psychological, hermeneutic, metafictional and ethical one: we encounter literary and psychological secrets that resist decipherment, bodies that cannot be penetrated, writers depicted as intruders, parents that ask to be welcomed by their children.
This study also identifies, in Coetzee's narrative, an ethical proposal grounded on a logic of excess and unconditionality - a logic of 'not enough' - lying behind certain acts of hospitality, friendship, kindness, care, and guidance to the gate of death, acts that may transform prevailing unequal socio-historical conditions and hostile personal relationships, characterized by a logic of parasitism and intrusion. As the figure of the writer progressively gains explicit prominence in Coetzee's literary production, special attention will be paid to it, as it alternately appears as secretary and master, migrant and intruder, pervert and foe, citizen and neighbour. Overall, Acts of Visitation analyzes how Coetzee's works depict the (South) African land, the Karoo farm, the familial household or the writer's and literary character's house as simultaneously contending and redemptive sites in which urgent historical, ethical, and metafictional issues are spatially explored and dramatized.' (Publishers' website)

Works published before Coetzee's arrival in Australia including, Dusklands, In the Heart of the Country, Waiting for the Barbarians, Life &​ Times of Michael K, Age of Iron, Disgrace, Foe, Boyhood and The Master of Petersburg are also discussed in this critical work.

1 J. M. Coetzee and Patrick White: Explorers, Settlers, Guests María J. López , 2011 single work criticism
— Appears in: Strong Opinions : J. M. Coetzee and the Authority of Contemporary Fiction 2011; (p. 35-52)
1 Foe : A Ghost Story María J. López , 2010 single work criticism
— Appears in: The Journal of Commonwealth Literature , vol. 45 no. 2 2010; (p. 294-310)
'This article argues that J.M. Coetzee’s Foe (1986) may be read as a ghost story, in which Coetzee writes back to Daniel Defoe’s “A True Relation of the Apparition of One Mrs.Veal”.The ghostly character of Coetzee’s novel derivesfrom the silences and secrets pervading the narrator Susan’s story, among which Friday’s mute and enigmatic presence is the most overwhelming, and from the presence of strange creatures that seem to come from various Defoe’s literary works. Hence Susan begins to doubt her own ontological status and to consider herself, and also Friday and Foe, as ghosts, a notion which is explored in relation to Freud’s analysis of the uncanny and the double. Foe, thus, highlights an intimate relation between literature and secrecy, an idea that is developed in relation to the thinking of Jacques Derrida, J.Hillis Miller and Frank Kermode,thissecret and indecipherable dimension of the literary work demanding, in turn, a position of blindness and lack of authority from both writer and critic.' (Publication abstract)
X