AustLit logo

AustLit

Issue Details: First known date: 2022... 2022 Animals in Quarantine : Biosecurity Vs. Biodiversity
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'There are important connections between human and nonhuman animals in quarantine that have implications for biosecurity laws and the loss of biodiversity in Australia. The laws typically function as thinly disguised quarantine legislation and are wide-sweeping, manifestly averse to biodiversity, and mostly supportive of the primary animal agriculture industries of cattle and sheep farming. The undeclared and evident hostility to biodiversity that the laws represent is increasing, not reducing the risk of pandemics. Zoonosis, or the transfer of a disease from a nonhuman to human animal, triggers pandemics, and diseased animals are rife in animal agriculture, in other areas of food production where nonhuman animals are trafficked, and in rural and other outback environments where animal agriculture interests are eroding or deeply compromising biodiversity. Reducing the phenomenon of humans in quarantine means questioning animal agriculture and the biosecurity laws that support it. This kind of questioning appears in aesthetic responses to animal agriculture and the ecophobic, speciesist, and anthropocentric contours of that agriculture. The crime thriller film Mystery Road, directed by First Nations Australian filmmaker Ivan Sen, represents that questioning. Subtly but powerfully, the film castigates animal agriculture’s targeting of wild dog and other wild animal populations for eradication and cows and sheep and other industrially farmed animals for reduction to lumps of meat. This targeting foments antagonisms between biosecurity and biodiversity, legitimizes the practices of quarantining many animals for much of their lives, and paves the way for humans serving time in quarantine.' (Publication abstract)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

  • Appears in:
    y separately published work icon ANQ vol. 35 no. 4 2022 25526452 2022 periodical issue 2022 pg. 388-397
Last amended 9 Dec 2022 06:05:01
388-397 Animals in Quarantine : Biosecurity Vs. Biodiversitysmall AustLit logo ANQ
X