AustLit
Latest Issues
AbstractHistoryArchive Description
Notes
-
Author's note: This book is inspired by anger and hope. The anger comes from watching as Australian literature is dismantled by the people charged with preserving the best of our writing for future generations. And the hope? It grows out of a sense that neither academics nor publishers will rescue our collective literary achievement - it falls to ordinary readers to do what they cannot.
-
Dedication: For Frances
-
Epigraph: 'As a teacher he is involved in a task which would appear impossible by the standards of the scientific laboratory: to teach what, strictly speaking, cannot be taught, but only 'caught', like a passion, a vice or virtue. This 'impossibility' is the inspiration of his work.' -Erich Heller
'I shouldn't worry about 'international standards'. Every country can produce its own great literature and needs no comparisons.' -Christina Stead, Letter to Ron Geering
Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of
Other Formats
- Also large print.
Works about this Work
-
The Voice and the Canon
2022
single work
column
— Appears in: The Weekend Australian , 18 June 2022; (p. 17)'Literature by Indigenous Australians - the voice from the heart - is the true core of the Australian canon, writes Geordie Williamson The ur-text of the Australian canon appeared just over two centuries ago, in 1819, when First Fruits of Australian Poetry by Barron Field, a Supreme Court judge of New South Wales with literary pretensions, was published in Sydney.' (Introduction)
-
Literary Criticism in Australia
2020
single work
criticism
— Appears in: The Routledge Companion to Australian Literature 2020; (p. 125-133)'This chapter examines three major strands of literary criticism in Australia: scholarly criticism, popular criticism, and vernacular criticism. Scholarly criticism refers to peer-reviewed critical work produced by credentialed scholars within the bureaucratic structures of contemporary universities. Popular criticism is aimed at the general public and produced in print or online periodicals; its most prevalent form is the book review. Vernacular criticism refers to non-specialised modes of everyday criticism that occurs on social reading sites like Goodreads, in book clubs, in classrooms, and so forth. While these practices all have different contexts, many of them are undertaken by the same practitioners, and there is often significant overlap between scholarly and popular criticism, in particular. While it is often claimed that Australian literary criticism is in decline, available data suggest something more ambivalent: the production of scholarly criticism has increased but popular criticism may have experienced a slight decline.'
Source: Abstract.
-
Book Review : The Burning Library : Our Great Novelists Lost and Found
2013
single work
review
— Appears in: Queensland Review , December vol. 20 no. 2 2013; (p. 236-237)
— Review of The Burning Library : Our Great Novelists Lost and Found 2012 selected work criticism -
Anger and Hope
2013
single work
review
— Appears in: Australian Book Review , February no. 348 2013; (p. 14-15)
— Review of The Burning Library : Our Great Novelists Lost and Found 2012 selected work criticism -
Local Writers Fire Passions
2013
single work
review
— Appears in: The Canberra Times , 23 February 2013; (p. 20)
— Review of The Burning Library : Our Great Novelists Lost and Found 2012 selected work criticism
-
Passions Provoked by the Book
2012
single work
review
— Appears in: The Weekend Australian , 27 - 28 October 2012; (p. 22-23)
— Review of The Burning Library : Our Great Novelists Lost and Found 2012 selected work criticism ; By the Book : A Reader's Guide to Life 2012 single work prose -
Critical Juncture
2012
single work
review
— Appears in: The Saturday Age , 17 November 2012; (p. 26-27) The Sydney Morning Herald , 17-18 November 2012; (p. 30-31)
— Review of The Burning Library : Our Great Novelists Lost and Found 2012 selected work criticism -
Auto Da Fe
2013-
single work
review
— Appears in: Sydney Review of Books , January 2013;
— Review of The Burning Library : Our Great Novelists Lost and Found 2012 selected work criticism -
Local Writers Fire Passions
2013
single work
review
— Appears in: The Canberra Times , 23 February 2013; (p. 20)
— Review of The Burning Library : Our Great Novelists Lost and Found 2012 selected work criticism -
Anger and Hope
2013
single work
review
— Appears in: Australian Book Review , February no. 348 2013; (p. 14-15)
— Review of The Burning Library : Our Great Novelists Lost and Found 2012 selected work criticism -
Celebrating Great but Outmoded Writers Who Faded From View
2012
single work
column
— Appears in: The Australian , 19 October 2012; (p. 5) -
Museum Mentality
Who Killed Australian Literature?
2012
single work
criticism
— Appears in: The Weekend Australian , 20-21 October 2012; (p. 8-9) -
What I’m Reading
2013
single work
column
— Appears in: Meanjin Online 2013; -
The Voice and the Canon
2022
single work
column
— Appears in: The Weekend Australian , 18 June 2022; (p. 17)'Literature by Indigenous Australians - the voice from the heart - is the true core of the Australian canon, writes Geordie Williamson The ur-text of the Australian canon appeared just over two centuries ago, in 1819, when First Fruits of Australian Poetry by Barron Field, a Supreme Court judge of New South Wales with literary pretensions, was published in Sydney.' (Introduction)
-
Literary Criticism in Australia
2020
single work
criticism
— Appears in: The Routledge Companion to Australian Literature 2020; (p. 125-133)'This chapter examines three major strands of literary criticism in Australia: scholarly criticism, popular criticism, and vernacular criticism. Scholarly criticism refers to peer-reviewed critical work produced by credentialed scholars within the bureaucratic structures of contemporary universities. Popular criticism is aimed at the general public and produced in print or online periodicals; its most prevalent form is the book review. Vernacular criticism refers to non-specialised modes of everyday criticism that occurs on social reading sites like Goodreads, in book clubs, in classrooms, and so forth. While these practices all have different contexts, many of them are undertaken by the same practitioners, and there is often significant overlap between scholarly and popular criticism, in particular. While it is often claimed that Australian literary criticism is in decline, available data suggest something more ambivalent: the production of scholarly criticism has increased but popular criticism may have experienced a slight decline.'
Source: Abstract.