AustLit logo
Alternative title: Entertainment Industries
Issue Details: First known date: 2010... vol. 24 no. 6 2010 of Continuum : Journal of Media and Cultural Studies est. 1987 Continuum : Journal of Media & Cultural Studies
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.


  • Contents indexed selectively.


* Contents derived from the 2010 version. Please note that other versions/publications may contain different contents. See the Publication Details.
Towards an Understanding of Australian Genre Cinema and Entertainment : Beyond the Limitations of 'Ozploitation' Discourse, Mark David Ryan , 2010 single work criticism
'While Australian cinema has produced popular movie genres since the 1970s, including action/adventure, road movies, crime, and horror movies, genre cinema has occupied a precarious position within a subsidized national cinema and has been largely written out of film history. In recent years the documentary Not Quite Hollywood (2008) has brought Australia's genre movie heritage from the 1970s and 1980s back to the attention of cinephiles, critics and cult audiences worldwide. Since its release, the term 'Ozploitation' has become synonymous with Australian genre movies. In the absence of discussion about genre cinema within film studies, Ozploitation (and 'paracinema' as a theoretical lens) has emerged as a critical framework to fill this void as a de facto approach to genre and a conceptual framework for understanding Australian genres movies. However, although the Ozploitation brand has been extremely successful in raising the awareness of local genre flicks, Ozploitation discourse poses problems for film studies, and its utility is limited for the study of Australian genre movies. This paper argues that Ozploitation limits analysis of genre movies to the narrow confines of exploitation or trash cinema and obscures more important discussion of how Australian cinema engages with popular movie genres, the idea of Australian filmmaking as entertainment, and the dynamics of commercial filmmaking practises more generally.' (Author's abstract)
(p. 843 - 854)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Last amended 27 May 2011 10:32:58
    Powered by Trove