AustLit logo

AustLit

Issue Details: First known date: 2002... 2002 The Black Lords of Summer : The Story of the 1868 Aboriginal Tour of England and Beyond
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

An amazing account of the establishment and reception of the Aboriginal team which represented Australia in the 1868 tour of England. Written and researched by well known cricket author Ashley Mallett.

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Works about this Work

[Review Essay] The Black Lords of Summer: The Story of the 1868 Aboriginal Tour of England and Beyond Bernard Whimpress , 2003 single work essay
— Appears in: Australian Aboriginal Studies , no. 1 2003; (p. 90-91)

'Ashley Mallett’s newest book, The Black Lords of Summer, his fourth for UQP, purports to be historical and is possibly his most ambitious work. Its subtitle suggests that it might provide a narrative history of the tour and examine its repercussions. It would be nice to say that it succeeds but it doesn’t. It doesn’t ask historical questions and it doesn’t reach historical conclusions. The author (a journalist by training) may feel that words like ‘story’ and ‘beyond’ give him the licence to stray off the track but good journalists, and especially good historians, maintain much better control over their material than is exhibited here.'  (Introduction)

[Review Essay] The Black Lords of Summer: The Story of the 1868 Aboriginal Tour of England and Beyond Bernard Whimpress , 2003 single work essay
— Appears in: Australian Aboriginal Studies , no. 1 2003; (p. 90-91)

'Ashley Mallett’s newest book, The Black Lords of Summer, his fourth for UQP, purports to be historical and is possibly his most ambitious work. Its subtitle suggests that it might provide a narrative history of the tour and examine its repercussions. It would be nice to say that it succeeds but it doesn’t. It doesn’t ask historical questions and it doesn’t reach historical conclusions. The author (a journalist by training) may feel that words like ‘story’ and ‘beyond’ give him the licence to stray off the track but good journalists, and especially good historians, maintain much better control over their material than is exhibited here.'  (Introduction)

Last amended 1 Jul 2009 11:01:55
X