AustLit
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.
Latest Issues
Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of
Works about this Work
-
Satirising White Australia in Christina Stead’s For Love Alone
2012
single work
criticism
— Appears in: JASAL , vol. 12 no. 1 2012; 'Christina Stead's For Love Alone is an iconic text in Australian literary studies, but until now, few critics have addressed the novel's treatment of colonialism and race relations. Feminist critics have played an important role in preserving Stead's reputation, and for this reason, most critical discussions of For Love Alone focus on its gender politics. This criticism generally regards Stead's protagonist, Teresa Hawkins, as a feminist heroine engaged in a struggle against patriarchy. This ideological approach is a valuable corrective to more autobiographical readings of For Love Alone, which treat the novel, rather reductively, as an account of Stead's personal experiences or as an expression of her 'private mythology'. Yet I argue that in taking Teresa for a heroine, feminist scholars do not sufficiently recognise Teresa's status as an object of satire. In this article, I highlight Stead's sharply satiric portrayal of Teresa as a narcissist, whose voyage of discovery ironically highlights her inability to learn or to change. I contend that Teresa's journey to London reveals her affinities with the regressive, racist ideology of her father and her love object, Jonathan Crow. In her self-appointed role as an 'Australian Ulysses', Teresa demonstrates the links between Australian nationalism, imperialism and racist ideologies. Without disputing the importance of feminist themes in the novel, I propose a new reading of For love alone as a complex work of postcolonial satire.' (Author's abstract)
-
Satirical Histories: Moonlite and The Adventures of Christian Rosy Cross
2008
single work
criticism
— Appears in: David Foster : The Satirist of Australia 2008; (p. 61-87) -
The Colonizer's Gift of Cursing : Satire in David Foster's Moonlite
2005
single work
criticism
— Appears in: Cheeky Fictions : Laughter and the Postcolonial 2005; (p. 107-116) 'Moonlite offers a more complex account of colonialism than the simple colonizer / colonized dichotomy. The source of its humour lies in the multiple ironies of history, where the colonized colonize in turn. Despsite the tragedy of loss and displacement, the novel suggests that the process has a degree of inherent silliness as settler-societies, like Australia, mimic and admire the patterns of the colonzing society that has expolited them.' -
The Absurdity of Necessity
1998
single work
review
— Appears in: Australian Book Review , May no. 200 1998; (p. 18)
— Review of Moonlite 1981 single work novel -
David Foster's 'Moonlite': Re-Viewing History as Satirical Fable- Towards a Post-Colonial Past
1997
single work
criticism
— Appears in: Westerly , Autumn vol. 42 no. 1 1997; (p. 71-88)
-
Finding Their Range : Some Recent Australian Novels
1981
single work
review
— Appears in: Meanjin , Summer vol. 40 no. 4 1981; (p. 522-525)
— Review of Turtle Beach 1981 single work novel ; Bliss 1981 single work novel ; Man of Letters : A Romance 1981 single work novel ; City of Women : A Novel 1981 single work novel ; Moonlite 1981 single work novel ; Monkeys in the Dark 1980 single work novel -
The Experimenters
1982
single work
review
— Appears in: Overland , July no. 88 1982; (p. 62-65)
— Review of The Escape Machine 1981 selected work short story ; Who Shot George Kirkland? : A Novel About the Nature of Truth 1981 single work novel ; The Wife Specialist : Stories 1979 selected work short story ; Moonlite 1981 single work novel -
Entertaining and a Poser of Big Questions
1981
single work
review
— Appears in: The Bulletin , 23 June vol. 101 no. 5268 1981; (p. 87-88)
— Review of Moonlite 1981 single work novel -
The Absurdity of Necessity
1981
single work
review
— Appears in: Australian Book Review , August no. 33 1981; (p. 1)
— Review of Moonlite 1981 single work novel -
Untitled
1983
single work
review
— Appears in: Science Fiction : A Review of Speculative Literature , vol. 5 no. 1 (Issue 13) 1983; (p. 32-33)
— Review of Moonlite 1981 single work novel -
Bare-Breech'd Brethren : The Novels of David Foster
1987
single work
criticism
— Appears in: Southerly , June vol. 47 no. 2 1987; (p. 126-144) -
The Colonizer's Gift of Cursing : Satire in David Foster's Moonlite
2005
single work
criticism
— Appears in: Cheeky Fictions : Laughter and the Postcolonial 2005; (p. 107-116) 'Moonlite offers a more complex account of colonialism than the simple colonizer / colonized dichotomy. The source of its humour lies in the multiple ironies of history, where the colonized colonize in turn. Despsite the tragedy of loss and displacement, the novel suggests that the process has a degree of inherent silliness as settler-societies, like Australia, mimic and admire the patterns of the colonzing society that has expolited them.' -
Satirical Histories: Moonlite and The Adventures of Christian Rosy Cross
2008
single work
criticism
— Appears in: David Foster : The Satirist of Australia 2008; (p. 61-87) -
Satirising White Australia in Christina Stead’s For Love Alone
2012
single work
criticism
— Appears in: JASAL , vol. 12 no. 1 2012; 'Christina Stead's For Love Alone is an iconic text in Australian literary studies, but until now, few critics have addressed the novel's treatment of colonialism and race relations. Feminist critics have played an important role in preserving Stead's reputation, and for this reason, most critical discussions of For Love Alone focus on its gender politics. This criticism generally regards Stead's protagonist, Teresa Hawkins, as a feminist heroine engaged in a struggle against patriarchy. This ideological approach is a valuable corrective to more autobiographical readings of For Love Alone, which treat the novel, rather reductively, as an account of Stead's personal experiences or as an expression of her 'private mythology'. Yet I argue that in taking Teresa for a heroine, feminist scholars do not sufficiently recognise Teresa's status as an object of satire. In this article, I highlight Stead's sharply satiric portrayal of Teresa as a narcissist, whose voyage of discovery ironically highlights her inability to learn or to change. I contend that Teresa's journey to London reveals her affinities with the regressive, racist ideology of her father and her love object, Jonathan Crow. In her self-appointed role as an 'Australian Ulysses', Teresa demonstrates the links between Australian nationalism, imperialism and racist ideologies. Without disputing the importance of feminist themes in the novel, I propose a new reading of For love alone as a complex work of postcolonial satire.' (Author's abstract)
-
David Foster's 'Moonlite': Re-Viewing History as Satirical Fable- Towards a Post-Colonial Past
1997
single work
criticism
— Appears in: Westerly , Autumn vol. 42 no. 1 1997; (p. 71-88)
Awards
Last amended 11 Jun 2020 14:44:54
Subjects:
-
cAustralia,c
-
cUnited Kingdom (UK),cWestern Europe, Europe,
Settings:
- 1800-1899
Export this record