AustLit logo

AustLit

y separately published work icon Literature & Aesthetics periodical issue   peer reviewed assertion
Issue Details: First known date: 2013... vol. 23 no. 1 2013 of Literature and Aesthetics est. 1991 Literature & Aesthetics
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Contents

* Contents derived from the 2013 version. Please note that other versions/publications may contain different contents. See the Publication Details.
The Poetic Inaesthetic : Theorising the Contemporary Beyond Postmodernism, Ali Alizadeh , single work criticism
'Contemporary Australian poetry, as with many other forms of contemporary cultural production, has often been viewed as a postmodern phenomenon. In his influential 2007 essay “Surviving Australian Poetry: The New Lyricism”, for example, the poet and critic David McCooey has described the dominant mode of new Australian poetry as a hybrid negotiation of innovation (‘new’) with tradition (‘lyricism’) that deconstructs the oppositional drive of past avant-gardisms. But this perspective, whilst persuasive in discussing the work of a number of dominant poetic voices, appears insufficient in accounting for the complex work of the newer Australian poets whose poems break with thematic, aesthetic, and conceptual tenets of a postmodernist poetic doxa. This paper argues that the work of such contemporary poets can be best viewed through the prism of philosopher Alain Badiou’s notion of inaesthetics.' (Publication abstract)
(p. 155-171)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Last amended 23 Oct 2015 12:49:53
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X