AustLit logo
Issue Details: First known date: 2014... 2014 Going Against the Flow : The Secret River and Colonialism’s Structuring Oppositions
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

In its retelling of the narrative of colonial settlement in Australia, Kate Grenville’s The Secret River (2005) resonates with debates over Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal relations in contemporary Australia, as its representational strategies can be seen as undermining the kinds of metaphysical oppositions identified by theorists such as Benita Parry, Frantz Fanon and Homi Bhabha as crucial to the structuring of colonialism’s discursive field. The question I take up in this essay is how successful Grenville’s novel is in “repossessing the signifying function appropriated by colonialist representation” that Parry identifies as a necessary, yet insufficient, strategy for laying bare the rhetorical underpinning of the colonial enterprise. How successful is the novel in reconfiguring these signifying relations even as it relies on them to retell a mythic narrative of nation-building? And what does this analytic framework reveal about the blindnesses and omissions of canonical postcolonial criticism with respect to settler-invader contexts? [Author's abstract]

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Last amended 18 Jul 2014 10:03:00
http://postcolonial.univ-paris13.fr/index.php/pct/article/view/1670/1679 Going Against the Flow : The Secret River and Colonialism’s Structuring Oppositionssmall AustLit logo Postcolonial Text
X