ALEG is designed to be a tool to aid inquiry and research, to further understanding of Australia's literature.
ALEG's scope and functional requirements are described in the project's
Stage 1 report.
Some requirements and usages are easy to understand: provide a simple way to find out basic information about a work or an author. However, the potential value of a research tool relates not only to the breadth of the resource on which it operates but also on how flexible it is; how the researcher can use it to answer questions the designers of the system did not anticipate.
A key part of ALEG's potential is the way it can help to reveal and elucidate the relationships between the 'entities' making up Australian literature; the authors, works, publishers, movements, genres, cultural and political forces.
So, the research value of ALEG is not so much in the 'raw' data of who wrote what and when (vital as that is), but how that 'raw' data can be view as coherent clumps - the relationships that are unveiled when the core data is analysed.
ALEG is not a library catalogue system. Although the "base" entities
described by ALEG can be cast in terms used by traditional library systems
such as "title" and "author", ALEG's reason for existence is not to
duplicate the National Library of Australia's
Kinetica facility. Rather,
it is to make available a rich resource for people interested in Australian
Literature by providing:
- biographical information on creators
- extensive subject description of works, including relationships between
works, creators and general topics
- information about criticisms and reviews of work, including subjective rankings
- contextual (guided) access to full-content material where possible
There have been several recent data modelling and architecture exercises which have
greatly influenced the ALEG data model:
- The IFLA FRBR
- The INDECS project
- The Harmony ABC strawman proposal
- The ISO Topic Map standard
The IFLA FRBR
-
A recent (1998) development in the data modelling of library systems
was completed by the International Federation of Library Associations
and Institutions (IFLA). Known as the
FRBR
("Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records"), it
"teases apart" the concepts of Work, Expression, Manifestation and Item
and in so doing helps model and understand the relationships between titles.
For example, it can clearly identify two manifestations as embodiments of
the same expression, or two expressions as realisations of the same
work, although one may be a language translation of another.
The INDECS project
-
The INDECS project
(INteroperability of Data in E-Commerce Systems)
was established to develop a metadata framework for
representing intellectual property and the transactions
involving it. Their Schema
and Model documents
have a strong bent towards enabling e-commerce rights management related
transactions, but necessarily require a precise modelling of the
intellectual works and the agents who contribute to them. They also
use the basic Work, Expression, Manifestation and Item representations
of FRBR, but introduce the concept of the "Event" that describes how
these products came about - who did what, the context, the inputs to
the process.
The Harmony ABC strawman proposal
-
Many entities and relationships
which different systems in different application area
attempt to model are pretty much the same.
Rather than force each implementation to develop their own
representations, and hence waste effort and complicate
interoperability, the
Harmony
ABC proposal attempts to define a common framework which
diverse systems will be able to use. The ABC proposal acknowledges
that FRBR and INDECS were major sources of inspiration for their
work.
The ISO Topic Map standard
-
Thesauri are recognised as useful tools which add
structure to a subject list. The ISO Topic Map
standard
(ISO
13250) defines data structures which can be used as
a standard thesaurus (with broader, narrower, see also and preferred types
of relationships between topics), or as a standard "index" to a collection
of works. But Topic Maps have some other characteristics which make
them extremely powerful, including:
- Topics can be assigned Topic Types (eg, "illustrator", "mountain",
"country", "era"). Topic Types are themselves Topics.
- Topics can be arbitrarily linked together by "Associations". Associations
each have an "Association Type", which is itself a Topic.
- Topics are linked to resources by "Occurrences". The resource
being linked to plays a "Role" in the Occurrence. Roles are
themselves Topics.
A set of Topics, their associations and occurrences form a "Topic Map".
The Topic Map is quite separate from the underlying resources which
it describes. Hence, multiple Topic Maps can be assembled and
maintained quite independently of each other, and the underlying resource.