AustLit logo
y separately published work icon Overland periodical issue   peer reviewed assertion
Issue Details: First known date: 2004... no. 174 Autumn 2004 of Overland est. 1954 Overland
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Notes

  • Contents indexed selectively

Contents

* Contents derived from the 2004 version. Please note that other versions/publications may contain different contents. See the Publication Details.
Overland and Australian Culture, Nathan Hollier , single work column (p. 2-3)
Being John Leonard, John Leonard , single work correspondence
John Leonard (b.1940) distances himself from John Leonard's review of Les Murray's Collected Poems : 1961-2002
(p. 5-6)
Criticising the Critic, Michael Sharkey , single work correspondence (p. 6-7)
John Leonard, Poet, Responds, John Leonard , single work correspondence (p. 7)
More on Les and the Two Johns, Jennifer Harrison , single work correspondence
Jennifer Harrison strongly disagrees with Overland Poetry editor John Leonard's review of Les Murray's Collected Poems 1961-2002.
(p. 7-8)
And Another..., Alan Gould , single work correspondence
Alan Gould strongly disagrees with Overland Poetry editor John Leonard's review of Les Murray's Collected Poems 1961-2002.
(p. 8)
In Praise of John Leonard's Criticism, Geoff Goodfellow , single work correspondence (p. 8-9)
Fifty Years of Overland, Francis Oeser , single work correspondence
Francis Oeser remembers his first introduction to Overland in the 1950s and his invitation by Stephen Murray-Smith to join the editorial advisory panel.
(p. 9)
Untitled, Nicolette Stasko , single work correspondence
Nicollete Stasko agrees with John Leonard's review of Les Murray's Collected Poems : 1961-2002
(p. 9)
The Mood We Are In : Circa Australia Day 2004, Barry Hill , single work essay
Barry Hill explores Australian culture and national identity in the light of global terrorism and social change. The influence of Corporate America is felt by Australians who care about their country.
(p. 10-21)
Psychological Flight and Destruction, Jane Grant , single work biography (p. 45-50)
The Argument of the Broken Pane : Henry Handel Richardson's Response to the Suffragette Movement, Michael Ackland , single work biography (p. 51-57)
'Brisbane's Little Chelsea' : The Cultural Legacy of the Barjai and Miya Groups, Joanne Watson , single work criticism
Joanna Watson outlines the development of the little known Barjai Group of post-war writers and poets in Brisbane. She also provides and insight into the origin of the Miya Studio Group of Young artists.
(p. 58-62)
My Fifty Years with Overland, Vane Lindesay , single work criticism (p. 63-66)
New Year's Eve, Stephen Moline , single work short story crime (p. 67-70)
Designer Babyware Party (Genetically Modified) : Ultimate Consumer Specialsi"I'd like a boy", Helen Cerne , single work poetry (p. 71)
Faithless Street, Nicola Haywood , single work short story (p. 72-74)
On the Horizon, Clint Greagen , single work short story (p. 75-78)
Demographic Manifestoi"embryo-12 years", Paul Mitchell , single work poetry (p. 78)
Amazing Things, Michael Wilding , single work short story autobiography
'Joe passed the typescript across. There was nothing said. No ‘look on these words’, no ‘as when the sun breaks through the weltering clouds and pricks out characters of rare device’. Nothing but his blank expression, the expression he used when attempting lack of expression. ‘Just be yourself,’ I told him. ‘That look gives it away, don’t try, just act like you write, totally expressionless.’ It made no difference. Somewhere, could it have been by correspondence course, he had learnt his expression degree zero, of how to achieve power over others, and he would never surrender it. That, you might think, boded well for the rest of us. A warning sign. But he used it so widely that what it warned could not be deduced. It did not necessarily indicate malice. It might be an attempt to conceal joy. Or desire. Envy. Despair. Anything but detachment or disinterest.' (Introduction)
(p. 79-85)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Works about this Work

Academic Journals Prove Provocative Rachel Cunneen , 2004 single work review
— Appears in: The Canberra Times , 3 July 2004; (p. 8a)

— Review of Overland no. 174 Autumn 2004 periodical issue ; Island no. 96 Autumn 2004 periodical issue ; Heat no. 7 (New Series) 2004 periodical issue ; Griffith Review no. 4 Winter 2004 periodical issue
Academic Journals Prove Provocative Rachel Cunneen , 2004 single work review
— Appears in: The Canberra Times , 3 July 2004; (p. 8a)

— Review of Overland no. 174 Autumn 2004 periodical issue ; Island no. 96 Autumn 2004 periodical issue ; Heat no. 7 (New Series) 2004 periodical issue ; Griffith Review no. 4 Winter 2004 periodical issue
Last amended 14 Jul 2004 15:57:05
X